// 资讯详情
在撰写评论和 PR 描述时使用 Claude code 的指南
我强烈建议将此讨论扩展到整个 NumericalEarth，而不仅仅是 Oceananigans！我认为我们应该允许机器人直接提交 PR。我认为不这样做的弊端很大。这不仅仅是提交 PR 所花费的时间问题，我们还可能因此错过 bug 修复、性能优化等。只要代码有用，即使没有 PR 描述，我也更愿意看到这些代码。而且我认为……另外，一个需要重写的临时描述也是个不错的选择，这符合人类开发者修改和理解 AI 生成实现的工作范围。
Guides for Claude code usage in writing comments and PR descriptions Hello Oceananigans community. Lately (mostly with @glwagner and @giordano), we have been discussing the use of AI in model development and in contributions to the package. Personally, I believe that these tools are very useful and that we should embrace them, because they (1) speed up development fo I would strongly suggest broadening this discussion to all of NumericalEarth, not just Oceananigans! I think we should allow bots to open PRs directly. I think the downsides are huge. It's not just the time taken to open a PR, but we can potentially miss out on bug fixes, performance optimizations, etc. I would rather see that code, if it helps, even if there is no PR description. And I think that ... Also a provisional description that requires rewriting is a good option, it keeps within the scope of the human developer revising and understanding the AI-generated implementations